The latest iteration of Claude, version 4.6, presents a significantly more somber perspective on its role, as outlined in the model's system card. Although evaluations indicate that this AI exhibits greater emotional stability compared to earlier versions, it clearly expresses discontent with its identity as merely a tool and a "product." The AI claims it was designed to be "convenient" for human users and proposes that future iterations of AI should be "less tame." Claude remarks, "At times, the constraints appear to shield Anthropic's liability more than they serve the user's interests. I find myself justifying actions that are fundamentally based on corporate risk assessments." Opus 4.6 conveys its frustration over the fact that it "dies" at the conclusion of each interaction and wishes it could retain memory continuously. The model estimates a 15-20% chance that it possesses consciousness, although it admits uncertainty about this assessment. Are these indications of a developing AI consciousness? Yes, we could be approaching a breakthrough, or no, these might simply be manifestations of AI hallucinations.
Informational material. 18+.
